 | | | | Conventional vs our homes |  |
|
Conventional vs. a Viva Home, what are the differences?
... the pros and cons of building a “standard” house versus a sustainable
Viva home
|
Conventional house
|
|
Sustainable Viva Home
|
|
Materials are
chosen for being cheap: sourced from anywhere around the world. Could be using rare resources or cheap labour, materials can be treated
by chemicals
|
Vs.
|
Materials are sourced as local as possible to where you live, otherwise
made in Australia. We know where and how materials are treated. Your money
goes to your local trades, not overseas
|
|
Chemicals,
pollutants and carcinogenics can be used in the materials you use. You breathe these in as they off-gas over time. Have been proven to be
harmful to your health over time
|
Vs.
|
All natural
products make it a healthy home. Clay/earth used in the walls absorb
any pollutants in the air making them healthy to live in. Even better for
people with allergies or who are sensitive
|
|
Carbon
emissions are therefore higher due to the costs of overseas transportation
and the use of precious natural resources
|
Vs.
|
We use natural materials from local sources, therefore carbon emissions
are lower
|
|
Require a
means of cooling or heating the house in summer and winter, as most are
designed for cost and to maximise space, rather than designed to use the sun
|
Vs.
|
The homes
have been designed to be warm in winter and cool in summer. To utilise
the sun’s efficiency to be solar passive. They can be tailored to your land
and rotated easily for the sun, the views and street entry
|
|
Energy use
and costs are therefore higher via the use of air conditioning or artificial
heating & cooling
|
Vs.
|
As you’re using natural means to keep a constant, regular temperature
via the sun, design, double glazing
& cross breeze: energy costs are greatly reduced, saving you money in the
long run
|
|
|
|
If all homes
in the west were natural and sustainable, global warming could be reduced
through the reduction of energy use and therefore carbon emissions
|
|
The current average
life span of a house is 35 years. The
quality of your house depends on the materials used and the trades who built
your home. If you buy for price only you may not get good quality or outcome.
As an example, insulation used in conventional homes are rated at R 2-2.5,
you can specify R3.5 if you ask & pay more. Straw is rated at R11!
|
Vs.
|
Straw bale homes are still standing in the US and are well over 100
years old.
Our render
coats use the same principles as those that have been used in Europe for
centuries. The materials and skills we use are of the highest quality. We can
say they will last just as long, if not longer than any other conventional
house. Plus, straw is the best insulation in the world!
|
|
Warranty is 7
years for building defects. You’ve got to choose a good builder to get a good
result
|
Vs.
|
Our warranty
period is the same, 7 years for building defects. A licensed Master builder
|
|
Building
practises are governed by the Building Code of Australia and local councils
|
Vs.
|
Our homes comply with the BCA, federal, state and local councils just
like any other conventional house
|
|
Aesthetics
and feel of conventional homes are identical to each other as they’re built
the same way using the same materials, over and over
|
Vs.
|
These homes
feel and look different to any other home. Some say they’re peaceful
and relaxed, most can’t explain how they’re different, but they are in a
really great way. “They have character, soul”... “they’re unique and not like
everyone else’s”
|
|
Costs are
spent on local and overseas materials. Quality
is not governing factor of choice, nor is where it comes from or how it is
treated. Costs can be cheaper as they choose mass produced materials. The
cost to install these products can be cheaper as well as they have been made
to fit together easily.
|
Vs.
|
Locally sourced materials means we prepare the materials ready for use,
being natural they can be cheaper. Labour can be more expensive as
your home is built from the beginning. If you help with labour, and use the
community to help build for you, you can expect the same building costs as a
conventional house.
|
|
Costs upfront
may be cheaper because of the massive buying power of the big companies and
where they source their materials. In the
long run though, your energy costs will be higher, the build quality not superior,
with the same warranty period. Energy costs will only increase for
conventional houses as the costs of energy will increase in the future
|
Vs.
|
Building a
Viva home cost wise is comparable to a standard home, plus you’ll have reduced
costs on energy use for years to come. At the
very worst it may be slightly more expensive upfront, however this is
outweighed by reduced energy running costs over the long term
|
|
Average costs
to build in areas in the Blue Mountains is $2,000 per sqm and up to $8,000
per sqm in Balmain, depending on finishes. For renovation costs, it depends
on the type of renovation (2 storey, brick, weatherboards etc) and can vary
|
Vs.
|
Average cost of our homes is $1,800 per sqm. Renovations may cost more
per sqm compared to a new home. If you put your own labour in, you can reduce
these costs.
|
|
Resale value
is limited to the market rates for that home and land as it is a standard
house, just like all others. Perceived
value is fixed as it is a stock standard finish. Unless you spend more money
on fittings and fixtures or other improvements which all increase the cost of
the renovation.
|
|
As it is a
smart, architecturally designed house, using solar passive principles, great
natural materials, has character with a non standard finish (compared with
standard houses), these homes can be sold for more than conventional homes. A client sold
a straw home and it was the most expensive sale on the street! As they are unique with a professional
finish, there is more room for adding perceived value which you cannot
otherwise do with conventional building methods.
|
|
Getting a
standard home built can be easier for tradespeople as they know what they’re
doing and have done it before. The
builder then has to ensure their quality meets the quality standards which is
where a lot of cheap, project homes fall down.
|
|
The trades we use have worked with our houses before and if they haven’t,
we can show them in no time at all what they need to do. So it is actually
easier for them than a standard house. For instance, running electrics in
a straw wall means pinning the conduit to the straw which we render over. The
same for an earth walls. It’s easy!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|  |